Elliptic Curves
In the last installment, we found the rational points on a singular cubic
curve. What about non-singular cubics? Non-singular cubic curves are
called elliptic curves. (Actually, to be elliptic, we need to add "points
at infinity" and insist that they be non-singular as well, but we will
finesse this point.) The study of elliptic curves is an incredibly rich
branch of mathematics. Wiles' proof of Fermat's Last Theorem was actually
a proof of a certain fact about elliptic curves.
Suppose you are given two rational points on an elliptic curve. How could
you construct a third point? Draw a line through the two points and
intersect it with the elliptic curve. The resulting equation will be
cubic, but you already know that it has two rational roots (corresponding
to the original points) hence the third root must be rational as well.
What if you were only given one point? Borrowing an idea from
first-semester calculus, we could draw the tangent line through the point
and use that line to intersect with the curve.
For example, we know by Fermat's Last Theorem, that there are no
non-trivial solutions to the equation a^3 + b^3 = c^3, but what about
the variant:
a^3 + b^3 = 7c^3?
It is easy to find the small solution: a=2, b=-1, c=1. We will use this
to find other solutions. Letting x=a/c, y=b/c, we have the elliptic
curve x^3 + y^3 = 7 with rational point (2,-1). We want to find the
equation of the tangent line to the curve at this point. Implicitly
differentiating we find
3x^2 + 3y^2(dy/dx) = 0, so
dy/dx = - x^2/y^2 = - 4
and the equation of the tangent line is y = -4x + 7. To find the
intersection of this line with the cubic we substitute to obtain:
x^3 + (-4x + 7)^3 = 7
63x^3 - 336 x^2 + 588x -336 = 0
3x^3 - 16x^2 + 28x -16 = 0.
But we already know that 2 is a root of this equation. In fact, it must be
a double root, since the line is tangent to the cubic at that point, so
(x - 2)^2 must be a factor of the left-hand side:
(x - 2)^2(3x - 4) = 0
so x = 4/3 (and hence y = -4(4/3) + 7 = 5/3) are the coordinates of our
third point and give the solution a = 4, b = 5, c = 3 to our original
equation.
We could find more solutions by repeating the construction above with our
new point (4/3,5/3), but we want to illustrate the method with two
distinct points. Unfortunately, if we choose (4/3,5/3) and (2,-1) we will
just get (2,-1) back. (Why?) Instead, we note that the symmetry of the
equation tells us that (-1,2) is also a solution. Now the equation of the
line through (4/3,5/3) and (-1,2) is y = - (1/7)x + 13/7 and substituting
yields:
x^3 + (-1/7x + 13/7)^3 = 7 and (after clearing denominators)
114x^3 + 13x^2 - 169x -68 = 0
But we know that -1 and 4/3 must be roots and hence that (x + 1)(3x - 4)
must be a factor of the left-hand side:
(x + 1)(3x - 4)(38x + 17) = 0
So x = - 17/38 (and hence y = -(1/7)(-17/38) + 13/7 = 73/38) are the
coordinates of our third point and give the solution a = -17, b = 73, c = 38
to our original equation.
We can repeat these processes to obtain an infinite number of (primitive)
solutions to a^3 + b^3 = 7c^3.
Exercise: Find a small solution to a^3 + b^3 + c^3 = 6abc and then use
the techniques of this section to find other solutions. [Note the
symmetry of the equation.]
Next: Ramanujan's Observation
e-mail Les Reid